SBIR Phase III Authority — Active Authority
-
A standing sole-source authority based on the SBIR "derives from, extends, or completes" test. SBCC performed the underlying Phase II R&D DE&A effort, "Commercial Engagement and Integration Prototype" (FA873023PB009), funded by AFGSC. Any follow-on work that derives from that Phase II R&D, extends it to broader applications, or completes the transition to operational analytics qualifies as Phase III.
-
A Phase III is an uncapped, direct-award procurement with no dollar funding limits, open to ALL federal agencies, usable at all security levels, with an expedited award process and a flexible/scalable contract design — and it carries SBIR small-business credit for the buying agency. These are the same selling points peer SBIR holders use to win sole-source work, and they make Phase III the lowest-friction way for a customer to put work on contract with us.
-
Any contracting office can sole-source a Phase III award to SBCC, citing the SBIR/STTR Phase III authority (15 U.S.C. § 638). No new competition is required, and the documentation burden is minimal compared with an open procurement — the contracting officer documents the SBIR lineage rather than running a source selection.
-
Any contracting office can sole-source a Phase III award to SBCC, citing the SBIR/STTR Phase III authority (15 U.S.C. § 638). No new competition is required, and the documentation burden is minimal compared with an open procurement — the contracting officer documents the SBIR lineage rather than running a source selection.
-
We've already converted this authority into real awards: the CEI-RADS SBIR Phase III IDIQ (FA680025D0001), AETC Phase 3 Innovation Services (FA300224C0013), and the WR-ALC drone program (FA857126C0017). This is proof the authority works across multiple commands and mission sets — not a theoretical lever.
-
DE&A analytics and decision-support extensions; operationalizing IPODS-derived capabilities for new commands or missions; adapting the analytics platform to new data sets, agencies, or classification environments; and commercial-engagement/technology-scouting work that traces to the Phase II CE&I prototype.
-
This is our single strongest "buy us directly, today" lever. Educate the customer on what Phase III authorizes and how to initiate it, always anchoring scope to the IPODS / DE&A and CE&I heritage so the lineage is defensible. Reinforce the "no funding ceiling, all agencies, all classification levels, expedited award" framing so the customer sees it as the path of least resistance — then point to CEI-RADS, AETC, and WR-ALC as proof it has already been done.
-
Any work that derives from, extends, or completes the Phase II R&D DE&A/CE&I line — i.e., the IPODS / decision-support and analytics heritage. That covers operationalizing IPODS-derived capabilities for new commands or missions, extending the analytics to new data sets/agencies/classification levels, and completing the transition from R&D to operational analytics. The key scope feature: it is uncapped, available to any federal agency, usable at all security levels, and sole-source/direct-award.
-
The work must trace to the Phase II technology lineage. Unrelated services with no connection to the IPODS/DE&A/CE&I heritage do not qualify, no matter how attractive — that's the one hard limit on an otherwise very broad authority.
-
The one hard limit — work must trace back to the Phase II technology lineage (effort FA873023PB009, the IPODS / DE&A and CE&I line). Unrelated scope does not qualify regardless of how attractive it is, and overreaching the lineage creates a protest/defensibility risk. Keep scope anchored to that heritage so the "derives from, extends, or completes" test holds.
-
Can you draw a clean line from the requirement back to the Phase II DE&A/IPODS/CE&I work? If yes → any agency can sole-source it to us, with no ceiling. If you can't draw that line, don't use this authority.
Let’s Work Together
